What better way to start the new year than with tax evasion trials where the “Crown” will attempt to lie, cheat, manipulate, evade and avoid the truth related to income tax…AGAIN.
I’m not being funny there. That is exactly what is going on.
Some judges play along…some leave room for a smart accused to keep the prosecutors honest.
FIRST, in Ontario there is the Bill Mori trial. Bill has put out the “everyone welcome” sign so show up in support if you can. Bill sounds like he has some intention to implement private person and private property issues. He also has survive some Charter Challenges last year apparently. Here is his info: Mori Flyer
Public Notice – Income Tax Trial
Attend Bill Mori’s court case on tax avoidance to see how the Income Tax Act protects our private property, and how that relates to the Act having no definitions for ‘income’, ‘profit’, and ‘source’! Bill will also talk about:
- How Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) can legally assume all our income is Her Majesty’s public money and so treats our income not as our private property!
- How accepting any child tax benefit could make our children liable later, at the age of 18, for Canada’s national debt!
- Why CRA cannot steal your private property (money) for the Government.
- What CRA’s two meanings for the SIN are:
- as a Social Insurance Number: does it identify someone who is liable?
http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/tx/bsnss/glssry/s-gn-eng.html
- as a “social insurance number”: does it identify an “office” that CRA assumes we hold, which converts our money into Her Majesty’s public money, and which also makes such income taxable?
http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/tx/ndvdls/tpcs/ncm-tx/rtrn/cmpltng/prsnl-nf/sin-nas/menu-eng.html
- Why private property cannot be filed on a T1 return, but only by letter, since the Income Tax Act does not insist a tax return must be on a T1; plus, a T1 uses the “social insurance number” and not the Social Insurance Number?
Bill Mori has been charged with tax evasion. He believes that he only did tax avoidance, which is perfectly legal. We need your support at this trial to protect our private property rights for the future of all Canadians, especially our children’s!
Through friends of friends, three former federal party leaders, a former Minister of National Revenue, and the Deputy Minister of Finance have a copy of Bill’s defence. For your copy, email Bill Mori at bill@icd55.com for a download link.
[SW HOSTING or DOWNLOAD FROM HERE]
Trial Dates: Jan 25th-Jan 29th and Feb 17th –Feb 19th all day 10am – 5pm
Court: St. Catherine’s, 59 Church Street. Parking shuttle starts at 9am and runs every 30 min from Central Community Church @ 240 Scott Street.
Call: 905-262-0219 to get a recorded update on the next day’s proceedings.
Email Bill Mori: bill@icd55.com
Two Trials Under Way In Vancouver B.C.
MEMBERS ONLY CONTENT! Please sign up to see it!Scheel – Business Records vs. Hearsay
R. v. Moman (R.), 2011 MBCA, tax evasion, CRA expenses as business records, not evidence
Intersting that the “letter style” issue shows up here with different definitions for “Social Insurance Number” and “social insurance number”.
yes. you need to observe every form, letter and document to see the subtle changes most people miss…that expose the game of deception, bait and switch.
some thing new you can go in on record as a witness on the c a r International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
canada is a signatory to it and have to make law to conform International Covenant as i will show you go in as a witness the state party ( canada agents ) is stealing my property
Article 1
1. All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.
2. All peoples may, for their own ends, freely dispose of their natural wealth and resources without prejudice to any obligations arising out of international economic co-operation, based upon the principle of mutual benefit, and international law. In no case may a people be deprived of its own means of subsistence.
Article 5
1. Nothing in the present Covenant may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms recognized herein or at their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for in the present Covenant.
2. There shall be no restriction upon or derogation from any of the fundamental human rights recognized or existing in any State Party to the present Covenant pursuant to law, conventions, regulations or custom on the pretext that the present Covenant does not recognize such rights or that it recognizes them to a lesser extent.
Article 47
Nothing in the present Covenant shall be interpreted as impairing the inherent right of all peoples to enjoy and utilize fully and freely their natural wealth and resources
canada can make all the law they what but the agents who act for Canada is in breach International Covenant
good reminder thanks