When a bank goes broke they no longer need to go to the government begging for a bailout. They bypass that embarrassing venture and just take YOUR money directly. Cool Huh. Aren’t you pleased to save them the embarrassment and hassle of going to the government? Think of it as cutting out the middle man. The “government’s money” is really YOUR money and this way they get YOUR money directly.
Don’t believe bank bail ins are real? It has already happened in Canada, is happening now in Austria and happened recently in Cyprus…and more.
There is the occasional honest lawyer (yes really) Rocco Galeti sure seems to be one. Have a listen to him explain the bail in process.
https://youtu.be/gZsKTv4zrG4
This clip was taken from the 45.3 min mark on COMER VS Bank of Canada Video. (Watch Below)
Published on May 3, 2015
From the conference held in Montreal on April 26th. Footage from 99% Media. Edited to primary English excerpt.
In Canada their is a legal battle taking place, COMER vs the Bank of Canada.
COMER is the Committee On Economic and Monetary Reform, http://www.comer.org/.
The main talk is 72 minute with another hour of questions and answers – below.
EU Bail-In in Austria Underway
FOOTNOTE
While banks are getting bailed out and bailed-in they sometimes get off with billions of dollars in fines for corrupt activity and NO ONE is prosecuted. When a bank makes 10s of billions from corrupt activity and get fined a few billion, hey it is just the cost of doing business. Meanwhile bankers and executives escape scott free with their millions in salaries and bonuses – booty of their piracy in the banking trade. No personal accountability is an open invitation to continued criminal activity by people who have access to billions and destroy thousands of lives in one fell swoop. Huh.
If regulators REALLY want to stop this sort of crime you would think jailing a few hundred bankers might help that goal. I guess it is not the goal to stop it, those fines make a healthy income source for the regulators. So is it all just pirates income splitting the booty via a “legal” process?
US, Goldman Sachs reach $5B settlement over risky mortgages
By Eric Tucker, The Associated Press | The Canadian Press April 11, 2016
WASHINGTON – The Justice Department on Monday announced a roughly $5 billion settlement with Goldman Sachs over the sale of mortgage-backed securities leading up to the 2008 financial crisis. The government accused the bank of misleading investors about the quality of its loans.
The $5.06 billion deal resolves state and federal probes into the sale of shoddy mortgages in the run-up to the housing bubble and subsequent economic meltdown.
It requires the bank to pay a $2.39 billion civil penalty and an additional $1.8 billion in relief to underwater homeowners and distressed borrowers, along with $875 million in other claims.
“This resolution holds Goldman Sachs accountable for its serious misconduct in falsely assuring investors that securities it sold were backed by sound mortgages, when it knew that they were full of mortgages that were likely to fail,” Acting Associate Attorney General Stuart Delery said in a statement.
The agreement, smaller than deals reached with several of Goldman’s Wall Street counterparts, is the latest multi-billion-dollar civil settlement arising from the economic meltdown in which millions of Americans lost their homes to foreclosure or found themselves jobless. Other banks that settled in the last two years include Bank of America, Citigroup and JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The sums paid by some of the nation’s largest banks, intended to offer financial relief to some homeowners, aren’t nearly enough to reverse the damage of the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. The deal, which includes no criminal sanctions or penalties, is likely to stir additional criticism about the department’s inability to hold bank executives personally responsible.
Attempting to address those concerns, Deputy Attorney General Sally Quillian Yates issued department-wide guidance last year aimed at encouraging more criminal prosecutions of individuals for corporate wrongdoing. It’s unclear how many additional prosecutions will be brought as a result of the guidelines, which among other things direct civil and criminal lawyers to work together on investigations from the outset and focus on individuals.
Goldman had disclosed the settlement in January. Federal officials laid out additional allegations Monday in a statement of facts that accused the bank of making serious misrepresentations about the quality of mortgage-backed securities it sold.
The securities, promoted as relatively safe, contained residential mortgages from borrowers who were unlikely to be able to repay their loans.
The poor quality of the loans led to huge losses for investors and a slew of foreclosures, kicking off the recession that began in late 2007 as the housing market collapsed and investors suffered billions in losses.
The bank admitted that it did not share with investors troubling information that it had received about the business practices of some loan originators, and that it falsely told investors that the loans had been checked to ensure that they met quality standards.
In reality, Goldman knew that significant percentages of the loans failed those standards, leaving investors likely to lose money on defaults, the Justice Department said.
___
https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/us-goldman-sachs-reach-5b-settlement-over-risky-153455406.html
PDF OF ARTICLE – US, Goldman Sachs reach $5B settlement over risky mortgages
Associated Press writers Jeff Horwitz and Josh Boak contributed to this report.
___
Follow Eric Tucker on Twitter at https://www.twitter.com/etuckerAP
